(Note Jerome Armstrong had asked about this and discussed it over beers with Kos. Here is the transcript of the speech.)
Mark Strama's Speech at the
Bloggers' Caucus, DemocracyFest 2005,
Austin, Texas, June 17, 2005
Democracy for America held its annual training program for progressive activists--DemocracyFest 2005--in Austin, Texas, on June 17-19, with more than 1,000 people from all over the United States and even other countries attending. Some of the sessions included bloggers Jerome Armstrong of MyDD and Markos Moulitsas Zúniga of Daily Kos. Although Jerome and Markos were not able to attend the Bloggers' Caucus, the buzz of the conference was the speech by Texas state representative Mark Strama (D-HD50). Jerome was particularly interested in the third component, which is related to volunteer management.
Mark developed a plan to win that required a voter turnout of at least 60,000 in his district, which had been gerrymandered to dramatically favor Republicans. Mark's presentation at the Bloggers' Caucus, transcribed below, describes his electoral success, which was attained through a turnout of more than 65,000 voters and a margin of more than 550 votes in Mark's favor.
* * *
Collecting emails to communicate directly with voters
Because that email, that email address--according to MoveOn.org estimates--conservatively is worth 10 bucks, and you can collect a lot of them. I had a story of why they should share their email address with you, because people increasingly are tired of getting spam, tired of getting emails they didn't ask for, and are fearful that you are going to share it. So you have to have an excellent privacy policy, and you have to honor it. Because if you don't honor it, you ruin it for everyone else.
And you have to be able to explain to people what the value proposition is. What are they going to get by being on your team? In my case, as a candidate in a down-ballot race, it was a fairly easy case to make, because it is very difficult for them to get news about down-ballot races. And I was able to fill that void for them.
And secondly, part of my whole story line in my campaign--and I think it would be the story line of a lot of folks in this room--is that I am running against big special interests that are going to spend a lot more money than me in the last two weeks of the campaign, and the only way I have to refute whatever they say about me is to be able to communicate instantaneously, inexpensively, and interactively.
And people responded to that. I collected thousands of email addresses in my district. And when I got outspent by $250,000 [not a typo] in the last two weeks of my campaign, I truly believe the ability to communicate instantly with people and tell my side of the story made a huge difference.
Second thing about technology--and this is one of the differences between blogging and email. Blogging, people have to come to you to get the story. And a lot of people do, and I think the coolest thing about the blogging community is the network. All I have to do is stumble across one of the good blogs, and I will find my way to all of them because everyone connects to each other. That said, I still have to go look for the information. And when I have somebody's email address, I deliver it to their inbox, and that makes a big difference.
Then once you have their permission, attention, and their trust, you have to take advantage of the interactivity of this medium. You have to give them something that they can do when you read their email, and it cannot always be "Give me money." [Huge crowd laughter]
Allowing people to forward the message
Ask them to take action
Personal fundraising page
That is a powerful, powerful tool. It is a commercial tool. We developed it for about $1,000 because I was able to get a college student, for basically free pizza, to develop a technology that we were quoted a price for $25,000 from commercial vendors. And I am telling you, that was an incredibly powerful way for us to get people doing the hard work for us. And people want to do it. You know, if you take the high stakes out of the fundraising game and make so $10 and $20 donations matter, it is really empowering to people, and they don't hate the fundraising game as much as most politicians hate it when it is the $2,000 game, the high-stakes game where quid pro quo relationships evolve.
Integrate technology into field program.
When we had, for example . . . When we had the challenge of deploying volunteers to 42 polling places on election day in the primaries . . . I didn't have a primary opponent, and I used the primaries as my opportunity to introduce myself to the voters. So we wanted to have volunteers at every polling place, greeting people as they came out instead of as they went in, saying, "He wasn't on the ballot this time, but you need to know about Mark Strama."
Schedule fieldwork
On the back end, we got a spreadsheet that showed us exactly who was going to be where when. And we didn't have to lift a finger. That was an extraordinary time-saver for our field efforts. And it's the kind of thing that if you can find the right technologist to create those functionalities--and they are not hard to create, but they are not trivial--if you can find the right technologist, you can save a fortune on your field organizing and maximize your productivity, so that your field organizers are persuading voters rather than managing logistics.
With that, I will turn it over to the next speaker, and I appreciate you having me here today.
For a Word document copy of this transcript please email austinkos at gmail.com.
I am preparing a letter to the technology strategy and implementation teams for both the DNC and the DFA. Any suggestions or comments on this would be very welcome.
(On an aside I note that the very first communication regarding the new DNC site was an appeal for money through the purchase of Dembonds, rather than an appeal to get involved or get other people involved. I bought a Dembond and asked 30 friends to buy Dembonds. How much more effective would it have been have a system where the first contact is not an appeal for money but an invitation to join the cause and receive information?)
|
|
|
Permalink :: 7 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.